DeSantis’ Oversight District Files Motion to Dismiss Disney’s Countersuit: “Disney Has Unclean Hands”

    Back on August 18th, we reported that Disney had filed a countersuit in state-level court against the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District, claiming a breach of contract and constitutional violations. As a reminder, Disney is actually the defendant in the case, but the countersuit comes as they shift their strategy in the federal-level case against DeSanits, and go on offense locally.

    Now, the CFTOD plaintiffs in the state-level case have filed a Motion to Dismiss the countersuit by Disney. We’ll try to keep this as high-level as possible, but you can read the full documents at the end of this article.

    Essentially, in this new Motion to Dismiss, filed September 6th in Orange County, FL, the CFTOD plaintiffs argue that Disney’s counterclaims rely on a disputed fact that the Development Agreement and Restrictive Covenants (“Agreements”) are valid and enforceable. Disney argues that the Agreements are valid and builds its counterclaims on that presumption.

    The contracts were entered into by the former Reedy Creek Improvement District Board of Supervisors, but the Agreements were made between the same District that existed prior to the Governor’s takeover and after. Because the Governor and his rubber-stamp Legislature did not dissolve the District, the contracts remained in place.

    In fact, the District Charter that was drawn up by the Legislature says that the provisions of the establishing act “shall not affect existing contracts that the district entered into prior to the effective date of this act”.

    However, the CFTOD alleges a series of infirmities that render the Agreements null and void, in their opinion. The state-level case was opened back in May because the CFTOD plaintiffs were asking a judge to rule that the Agreements were null and void.

    In the CFTOD plaintiff’s view, the Agreements are null and void, so Disney’s latest countersuit should be dismissed because it relies on the Agreements.

    In another document filed yesterday, the CFTOD asserts that “Disney has unclean hands”, saying that Disney’s “absolute control” over the RCID has been the cause of the Agreements’ invalidity. In nearly every reply to the affirmative defense, the CFTOD alleges that Disney has “unclean hands” and should’ve known that the Agreements were “fatally defective”.

    In one reply, the District argues that “the District was not independent of Disney’s control and thus could not have waived its opportunity to object and challenge the Agreements”.

    Where this whole thing gets messy, in this writer’s opinion, is that the Legislature and Governor did not fully dissolve the RCID. Instead, they renamed the District and the Governor placed his own lieutenants on the Board to do his bidding. Without a clean break from the contracts and dealings of the past, the new Board is forced to find a way out of contracts that are legally binding and entered into by the same entity that exists today.

    Here are the documents that were filed recently:

    As always, keep checking back with us here at as we continue to bring you the latest news, photos, and info from around the Disney Parks!

    Have a story tip? Contact us! Newsletter

    Stay up-to-date with the latest Disney news, right to your inbox!

    Kingdom Destinations Quote

    Vacation Planning Assistance

    We're excited to partner with Kingdom Destinations to help you plan your next trip to Disney parks and experiences around the world. Kingdom Destinations is a full service travel agency, specializing in Disney destinations. Fill out the form below to schedule a free consultation with one of their professional travel advisors today!


    1. The agreements are invalid because RCID/Disney did not follow procedures exactly what happened in the Federal case. “Not a clean break”, except it was, but the district was reconstituted and existing valid contracts are allowed to continue especially RCID’s municipal bonds, which would be due immediately in the astronomical amount of $1 Billion. Disney doesn’t have that money laying around since paying for Hulu is the latest skirmish. The lawsuit is a waste of time. We need to ask the former board of RCID what they actually did to ensure the validity of the agreements other than be a rubber stamp and botch it.

    2. The writer of this article should review the laws of Florida before asserting any opinion about law or at least consult a lawyer before asserting the agreements were legal. Many of the lawsuits revolve around how tied RCID is to Disney and how Disney over the years asserted that RDIC is part of Disney which is impossible because a Business can’t own a Government but Disney treated RDIC as if they did own them and controlled RDIC in that manner.

    3. Wrong
      They got outmaneuvered and the SHAM board doesn’t like it.

      Where are the numbers that never get presented on the unfair amount Disney doesn’t pay
      The covenants were performed in a public forum in plain sight they were more concerned with pushing the Governors super majority then watching the shop.

      What about the bait and switch for the firefighters.

      What about Glen taking the 400K job and him resigning for conflict of interest.

      50 years no one complained

      Change the district legally

      a super majority override didn’t do anything but add overhead and autocracy to something that paid for itself

      over 2000 similar districts where is their retribution

      Such a SHAM

    Comments are closed. Newsletter

    Stay up-to-date with the latest Disney news, right to your inbox!

    Related Articles